Page Section: Centre Content Column
Breach of sexual boundaries with current patient (12HDC00518)
Download Breach of sexual boundaries with current patient (12HDC00518) (PDF 71Kb)
(12HDC00518, 13 June
General practitioner ~ Professional relationship ~ Sexual
boundaries ~ Zero tolerance ~ Rights 2, 4(2)
A woman complained that her general practitioner had behaved
inappropriately toward her. The woman consulted the GP at a medical
centre following a depressive episode. She had previously consulted
him at another medical centre for similar issues.
During the consultation, following a discussion about her
depression, the woman consented to a hug from the GP. Following
that hug, the GP locked his door and closed the blinds in his
office. He asked the woman to lean over a table and made
inappropriate sexual gestures. The GP then stopped, opened his
blinds and unlocked his door. He advised the woman that because of
what had happened, there had been a breach of the professional
relationship and he would need to write that up in his notes.
Later that day, the GP visited the woman at her place of work.
He shut her office door, and then undid his trousers and lay down.
He asked the woman to perform a sexual act on him, and offered to
perform a sexual act on her.
Some time later, the woman told another GP about these events.
The woman declined to take the matter further at that time;
however, she lodged a complaint with HDC some time later.
The Medical Council of New Zealand has a zero-tolerance position
on doctors who breach sexual boundaries with a current patient. A
breach of sexual boundaries comprises any words, behaviour or
actions designed to, or intended to, arouse or gratify sexual
desires, and incorporates any words, actions or behaviour that
could reasonably be interpreted as sexually inappropriate or
By making inappropriate sexual gestures during his consultation
with the woman, and then later visiting her, undoing his trousers
and asking her to perform sexual acts on him and offering to
perform a sexual act on her, the GP breached sexual boundaries and,
accordingly, breached Right 4(2). In addition, the GP harassed and
sexually exploited her, breaching Right 2.
The GP was referred to the Director of Proceedings for the
purpose of deciding whether any proceedings should be taken. The
Director laid a charge before the Health Practitioners Disciplinary
Tribunal. Professional misconduct was made out and conditions were
placed on the provider's practicing certificate and name
suppression was not granted to the provider. The issue of name
suppression was successfully appealed to in the High Court.