Page Section: Centre Content Column
Chiropractic management of elbow injury (07HDC17307)
Download Chiropractic management of elbow injury (07HDC17307) (PDF 167Kb)
(07HDC17307, 6 January
Chiropractor ~ Chiropractic clinic ~ Biomechanics ~ Elbow
injury ~ Treatment options ~ Information ~ Exploitation ~ Rights
4(1), 4(2), 6(1)(a), 6(3)(a)
A woman attended a chiropractic clinic for treatment of an elbow
injury. The chiropractor decided to assess her spine and
recommended that she undertake an intensive course of bio-mechanics
treatment to her spine over a six-month period requiring an initial
payment of $3,700. After receiving one treatment session to her
spine under the agreement she signed, the woman decided to withdraw
from the agreement. However, the chiropractor demanded that she pay
the amount in full.
It was held that the chiropractor artificially inflated the
potential seriousness of the woman's condition. In addition, he
failed to provide adequate information about bio-mechanics or about
his qualifications when asked, or about the elbow injury, breaching
Rights 6(1)(a) and 6(3)(a).
It was also held that there was no apparent clinical
justification for the recommended treatment, which was a
significant departure from professional standards. Accordingly, the
chiropractor breached Rights 4(1) and 4(2). His documentation of
the woman's care was poor and constituted a breach of Right 4(2).
He also failed to adequately store her clinical records. This was
one of his obligations as a health professional.
However, because the woman did not actually pay any money to the
chiropractor for the course of treatment, her right to be free from
financial exploitation was not breached. While the chiropractor
applied pressure on the woman, his conduct did not amount to
coercion, which carries with it an element of force or threat.
The clinic failed to take reasonably practicable steps to
prevent the chiropractor from breaching Rights 4 and 6 of the Code,
and therefore was held vicariously liable for the chiropractor's
The chiropractor was referred to the Director of Proceedings.
The Director decided to lay a charge of professional misconduct
before the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal. The matter
was heard on 24 May 2010 and proceeded by way of an agreed summary
of facts. In its decision dated 15 June 2010 the Tribunal upheld
all particulars and found the chiropractor guilty of professional
The Tribunal imposed the following penalty:
- 18 months' suspension to be followed by 18 months' supervision
with regular reports being provided to the Board, followed by a
further 18 months of case load supervision.
- Conditions including that prior to recommencing practice he
undertake training and demonstrate competency to the satisfaction
of the Chiropractic Board in:
- fundamental chiropractic assessments and examinations;
- risks associated with the routine use of X-rays and the
appropriate assessments needed prior to ordering them;
- informed consent ethics and the provision of information to
- client-centred practice;
- ethical business practice for chiropractors; and
- ethics generally.
- He is also to provide a mental health assessment to the
No fine was imposed owing to the chiropractor's financial
situation; however, costs of $5,000.00 ($3,000 for the Director,
$2,000 for the Tribunal) were awarded.
The chiropractor was subsequently named
by the Tribunal.
The Tribunal's full decision can be found at: http://www.hpdt.org.nz/Default.aspx?tabid=266