Page Section: Centre Content Column
Consumer-centred Care: Seamless Service Needed
Download Consumer-centred Care: Seamless Service Needed (PDF 99Kb)
This issue, Health and Disability Commissioner Anthony Hill
discusses a recent case that highlights what can be required to
deliver a seamless, consumer-centred service for a patient with
both aged care and mental health needs.
Patients will often move from one part of the health care system
to another, and back again, as they access the various services
they need. It is common for patients to have more than one issue or
diagnosis. For example, a patient with an intellectual disability
may also suffer from mental illness, or an elderly patient may have
co-morbidities which are not related specifically to age.
In order for patients with complex needs to receive appropriate
services there must be a series of systems, including skilled
people, all working together to deliver a seamless service to that
patient. Where any one or more of these safeguards does not operate
optimally there is the potential for delivery of appropriate
services to be compromised.
The importance of ensuring a seamless consumer-centred service
for a patient with complex needs was highlighted for me in a recent
case I considered.
Older patient needing acute mental health
care
In case 09HDC01408, 17 June 2011, a 64-year-old man
was admitted to a mental health acute care unit under the Mental
Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992 (MHA). The
man had been previously fit and healthy and had no history of
mental illness, but at the time of admission he was floridly
psychotic and considered a risk to himself and others. He was
suffering hallucinations and his conversation was bizarre with a
strong religious orientation. Various possible diagnoses of his
condition were discussed and considered such as frontal lobe
dementia, Lewy body dementia, some form of psychosis or a brain
tumour. Over the initial months of his admission various
medications were trialled to control his delusions. Initially, oral
medications were used (olanzapine, epilim, risperidone and
haloperidol). Each drug was given a trial of about a month by which
time, if he had been compliant, he would have been expected to show
some response. The man's family were of the view that he was
failing to take the medication, although he denied this.
After a period of time the man became less co-operative,
refusing to take oral medication, change his clothing, wash his
clothing or shower. The staff of the acute care unit considered
that their failure to intervene and attend to the man's personal
cares was not due to a lack of care or neglect but because they
considered intruding would be an invasion of the man's privacy and
seen as bullying. The view was to encourage the patient's autonomy
rather than impose cares on an unwilling patient.
It was decided that as the man was refusing all oral medication
he should receive his medication by injection and he was, after
ongoing refusals, prescribed the drug fluphenazine decanoate by
injection. The Medsafe datasheet recommended that the medication
should be used with care in people over the age of 60 and that
doses amounting to a quarter or a third of the doses used in
younger adults should be sufficient. The datasheet stated that if
an increase was necessary the doses should be gradually increased.
The doses for younger patients was 12.5 - 25 mg to initiate the
therapy. The man was given one initial test dose of 12.5 mg, and
the amount given amounted to at least 162.5 mg given between 21
April and 28 May.
After an initial improvement the man suffered what his family
refer to as "his crash". His movements suddenly became more
wooden, his speech was delayed and his facial expressions became
blank. He was never again able to recognise his family. His mental
state deteriorated further and his ability to provide his own cares
reduced. His family complained that he was neglected and dirty.
"Start slow and go slow"
The HDC expert geriatrician adviser, stated that "A more
cautious approach (… the geriatric adage: "start slow and go slow")
may have prevented this serious outcome, although even low doses
can cause problems in a person who is sensitive."
Autonomy and strategies for dealing with unco-operative
patients
The man's family believed that by leaving their father dirty and
unkempt he was not treated with respect. However, the hospital
defended the actions of the staff saying that when the man was
unco-operative or aggressive it would have been unsafe to try to
shower him under restraint. The acting unit manager told the family
that they left the man dirty and unkempt because it would upset him
if they attempted to intervene and if they took his clothes at
night while he was sleeping and laundered them, this would invade
his privacy. The family say he was a sound sleeper and his laundry
could easily have been handled while he was sleeping.
Although staff in acute psychiatric units are focused on
encouraging independence and avoiding being intrusive or directive,
the man required the strategies commonly used by dementia unit
staff to provide cares for irritable or unco-operative patients. As
I said in my opinion on the case:
I accept that Mr A would not have been easy to care for but it
is not uncommon in mental health or dementia units for there to be
issues with hygiene and/or personal care. Organisations must have
strategies for dealing with this. It is important to care for
physical as well as mental health needs.
I also noted that this office, in a previous opinion
(05HDC09043, March 2006), found a DHB had breached Right 4(1) of
the Code where the clinical staff did not have a clearly defined or
structured management plan for a patient recognised by the clinical
staff to be challenging. Knowing the patient was "at the difficult
end of a really difficult spectrum", it was even more important to
have such a plan.
Similarly, in another opinion about rest home care (08HDC17105 August
2009), the Deputy Commissioner highlighted the responsibility of
staff to explore different strategies and work with families to
manage difficult behaviour and poor personal hygiene in dementia
patients.
Communication key to seamless care
Returning to the case I summarised earlier in this article, the
organisation has since taken positive action to improve the pathway
of care for patients who at different times require both hospital
care and psychiatric care. The process that has been established is
that nursing staff from the elder care unit come to the psychiatric
unit to assist and provide advice regarding physical care for
elderly patients, and monitoring of changes in the patient's
behavioural presentation in conjunction with the psychiatric unit
staff. When the patient is transferred back to the elder care unit
nursing staff from the psychiatric unit remain in the elder care
unit until the staff there feel able to manage without their
assistance.
This case demonstrates the importance of recognising that what
is required to treat an older patient may differ from the usual
treatment of a psychiatrically unwell younger patient, both with
regard to the quantity of medication administered and also with
regard to the personal cares that are required. Each service had
skills and knowledge to benefit the patient and these needed to
combine effectively to meet the holistic needs of a complex
patient. It is essential that different units within the same
system communicate well and ensure that there is a safe and
seamless system to ensure that the patient moves between the
different providers and receives appropriate care at all
stages.
Anthony Hill, Health and
Disability Commissioner
NZ Doctor, 24 August 2011